01
Containment
Test whether systems can be isolated without losing sight of business impact.
TESTED IN CONTEXTCyber & Incident Response
Technical response is only one part of the crisis
Connect investigation and containment decisions with their operational, legal, regulatory and communications consequences.
ORGANISATION-GROUNDEDHUMAN-CONTROLLEDEVIDENCE-LED
01 · SIGNALPrivileged access compromisedNew evidence changes the operating picture.
02 · DECISIONCan the team contain the threat without losing control of operations, evidence and recovery?Ownership · Reasoning · Simulated time
03 · CONSEQUENCETechnical choice triggers business decisionThe crisis state responds.
LIVE
STATE
STATE
THE EXECUTIVE REALITY
Containment is a technical action with enterprise consequences.
Isolation may stop spread and halt production. Evidence preservation may slow recovery. A technically correct decision can still fail the organisation if its business effects are not understood and owned.
“Can the team contain the threat without losing control of operations, evidence and recovery?”
The live incident is the most expensive place to discover unclear authority, an untested dependency or a decision nobody owns.
REHEARSE BEFORE CONSEQUENCE BECOMES REAL.WHAT BECOMES OBSERVABLE
See the system behind the plan.
Move from four walls of documentation to a connected view of decisions, timing, ownership and impact.
02
Evidence
Rehearse preservation, uncertainty management and decision traceability.
TESTED IN CONTEXT03
Recovery
Challenge whether the organisation can restore safely under pressure.
TESTED IN CONTEXT04
Coordination
Connect technical work with leadership decisions and wider crisis response.
TESTED IN CONTEXTFROM CLAIM TO EVIDENCE
Make readiness visible while there is still time to improve it.
Cyception connects approved expectations to a live simulation and carries what happened into the next decision.
01
Know
Approved context
02
Simulate
Evolving pressure
03
Observe
Decision evidence
04
Retest
Measured improvement
THE CASE FOR ACTION
What leadership gains before the real crisis.
For incident response teams that need the wider organisation to move at the speed of the investigation.
01
Connect investigation to crisis leadership
↗02
Rehearse safe containment and recovery
↗03
Test evidence and uncertainty handling
↗04
Expose dependencies outside the SOC
↗BUYER QUESTIONS
What serious evaluation should ask.
Why is this different from a conventional tabletop?+
Cyception creates a stateful operating environment: participants receive information, make decisions and experience changing consequences. The exercise captures what happened instead of relying only on discussion and facilitator memory.
Do we need perfect plans before we begin?+
No. Existing approved material provides a starting point. Gaps, ambiguity and conflicting responsibilities are themselves valuable things for a simulation to reveal.
Can executives participate without technical training?+
Yes. Leadership is presented with the operating picture, uncertainty, options and consequences needed for the decisions it owns—not a technical interface it does not.
What happens after the exercise?+
Observations can become structured findings, accountable remediation and future retests so learning continues beyond the exercise report.
Test our response system